arbiter
JournalsAccount

Go-Shops Revisited

Guhan Subramanian & Annie Zhao

Harvard Law Review2020article
ABDC A*
Weight
0.26

Abstract

A go-shop process turns the traditional MA the Delaware courts signal qualified acceptance; and then a broader set of practitioners push the technology beyond its breaking point. In view of these developments in transactional practice, we provide recommendations for the Delaware courts and corporate boards of directors.

Cite this paper

@article{guhan2020,
  title        = {{Go-Shops Revisited}},
  author       = {Guhan Subramanian & Annie Zhao},
  journal      = {Harvard Law Review},
  year         = {2020},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Go-Shops Revisited

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.