Varieties of dependent growth models: External finance in Central and Eastern European economies

Tamás Tibor Csontos

Acta Oeconomica2025https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2025.00081article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract This paper explores the changing landscape of external finance in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) following the global financial crisis of 2008. Through comparative statistical analysis, it traces shifts in the primary sources of external finance, including foreign direct investment (FDI), EU subsidies, remittances, and external debt. The findings reveal a significant decline in the importance of FDI and external debt, offset by an increasing dependence on EU subsidies and remittances. The paper categorises countries into three groups according to their dominant source of external finance, with only one cluster remaining primarily FDI-led. By unpacking these varied forms of financial dependence, the paper provides a more nuanced understanding of post-crisis growth models in the CEE region. It concludes that, while the composition of external finance has shifted, overall dependency has persisted.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2025.00081

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{tamás2025,
  title        = {{Varieties of dependent growth models: External finance in Central and Eastern European economies}},
  author       = {Tamás Tibor Csontos},
  journal      = {Acta Oeconomica},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2025.00081},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Varieties of dependent growth models: External finance in Central and Eastern European economies

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.