Mastering the art and science of aiming

Unknown author

Human Resource Management International Digest2026https://doi.org/10.1108/hrmid-12-2025-0324article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Purpose This paper aims to review the latest management developments across the globe and pinpoint practical implications from cutting-edge research and case studies. Design/methodology/approach This briefing is prepared by an independent writer who adds their own impartial comments and places the articles in context. Findings This article highlights the results of a systematic review on how goal setting impacts knowledge worker productivity, that synthesized 29 studies to answer three key research questions. The findings reveal that clear, personalized, and well-monitored goals significantly boost productivity, while overly rigid or misaligned goals can backfire. The actionable recommendation insights for managers that transpired include to co-create goals with employees and to embed regular feedback loops to sustain engagement and performance. Originality/value Originality: The briefing saves busy executives, strategists and researchers hours of reading time by selecting only the very best, most pertinent information and presenting it in a condensed and easy-to-digest format.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/hrmid-12-2025-0324

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{unknown2026,
  title        = {{Mastering the art and science of aiming}},
  author       = {Unknown author},
  journal      = {Human Resource Management International Digest},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/hrmid-12-2025-0324},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Mastering the art and science of aiming

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.