arbiter
JournalsAccount

Erratum: Advancing critical biography with Indigenous methodology: understanding Maori entrepreneurship

Unknown author

Journal of Management History2026https://doi.org/10.1108/jmh-02-2026-0029article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

It has come to the attention of the publisher that the article, Rogers J., Laferriere R., Birdthistle N., and Bodle K. (2025), “Advancing critical biography with Indigenous methodology: understanding Maori entrepreneurship’’, Journal of Management History, Vol. ahead of print No. ahead of print. Link to the cited article incorrectly listed the affiliations of authors Jason Rogers, Naomi Birdthistle, and Kerry Bodle. The affiliations should read:Jason RogersDepartment of Management, Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Queensland, AustraliaNaomi BirdthistleDepartment of Management, Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Queensland, AustraliaKerry BodleDepartment of Accounting, Finance and Economics, Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Queensland, AustraliaThis error was introduced during the article publication process, for which the publisher apologises.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jmh-02-2026-0029

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{unknown2026,
  title        = {{Erratum: Advancing critical biography with Indigenous methodology: understanding Maori entrepreneurship}},
  author       = {Unknown author},
  journal      = {Journal of Management History},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jmh-02-2026-0029},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Erratum: Advancing critical biography with Indigenous methodology: understanding Maori entrepreneurship

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.