arbiter
JournalsAccount

Innovation Systems and the Sustainable Development Goals: Directionality, State Roles, and Capabilities for Transformative Change

Cristina Chaminade & Bengt‐Åke Lundvall

Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration2026https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.70062article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

The adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) has intensified debates on whether innovation system (IS) frameworks remain relevant for governing sustainability transformations. This article argues that IS are essential for understanding how directionality toward sustainability emerges through learning, institutional change, and evolving state roles. The paper distinguishes between reactive approaches grounded in historically accumulated capabilities and proactive strategies aimed at creating new development pathways aligned with societal goals, emphasizing interactions, synergies, and trade‐offs across social, economic, and environmental objectives. Four illustrative cases are examined: China and Denmark demonstrate how IS can gradually reorient capabilities toward multiple SDGs, while Seychelles and Costa Rica show how small and less mature IS pursue focused sustainability priorities through governance and institutional innovation.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.70062

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{cristina2026,
  title        = {{Innovation Systems and the Sustainable Development Goals: Directionality, State Roles, and Capabilities for Transformative Change}},
  author       = {Cristina Chaminade & Bengt‐Åke Lundvall},
  journal      = {Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.70062},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Innovation Systems and the Sustainable Development Goals: Directionality, State Roles, and Capabilities for Transformative Change

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.