arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

On the enumeration of resolute majority rules

Josep Freixas & Dani Samaniego

Journal of Combinatorial Optimization2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-026-01412-9article
AJG 2
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This paper considers resolute decision rules in which each voter may vote “yes", “abstain" or vote “no", and the outcome is “yes" or “no". The model we consider is more general than that of simple games since the input admits abstention or indecision, but it is more specialized since it assumes the properties of monotonicity and anonymity. Many subclasses of these resolute decision rules have been studied in the literature from an axiomatic point of view. The purpose of this work is to enumerate these subclasses as a function of the number of voters.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-026-01412-9

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{josep2026,
  title        = {{On the enumeration of resolute majority rules}},
  author       = {Josep Freixas & Dani Samaniego},
  journal      = {Journal of Combinatorial Optimization},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-026-01412-9},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

On the enumeration of resolute majority rules

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.