Hedonic and Utilitarian Value and Patient Satisfaction: Perceptual Differences between Patients and Providers

Kerri M. Camp et al.

Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship2017https://doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.3709.2017.ja.00003article
ABDC C
Weight
0.34

What the paper says

Healthcare is continually evolving to meet changing governmental regulations and a new emphasis on patient perceptions of quality care. Governmental mandates create a shift in focus from volume-based to value-based reimbursement for providers. The purpose of this article is to identify satisfaction drivers with particular emphasis on similarities and differences between the perceptions of hospital patients and providers. A combination of quality-based healthcare, stakeholder theory, and services literature points to key service outcomes including expectations, quality, value, and satisfaction. Multiple group structural equations modeling provides a vehicle for examining differences in relationships among these constructs between these two key stakeholders, patients and providers. Results suggest that utilitarian value is central to successful healthcare service experiences. But, the results also suggest differences between patients and providers in the way they believe utilitarian value affects outcomes; the results suggest that healthcare providers may underestimate utilitarian value’s role relative to patient perceptions.

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.3709.2017.ja.00003

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kerri2017,
  title        = {{Hedonic and Utilitarian Value and Patient Satisfaction: Perceptual Differences between Patients and Providers}},
  author       = {Kerri M. Camp et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship},
  year         = {2017},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.3709.2017.ja.00003},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Hedonic and Utilitarian Value and Patient Satisfaction: Perceptual Differences between Patients and Providers

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.34

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.