← Back to results Use of High‐ and Low‐Value Care Among Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries With and Without Medigap Sungchul Park & A. Mark Fendrick
Abstract Medigap coverage is associated with higher health care spending among TM beneficiaries, but does not consistently promote high- or low-value care. These findings highlight the need for policy reforms that provide incentives to supplemental insurance plans to encourage evidence-based service use and discourage spending on unnecessary care.
Open in an MCP-compatible agent ↗
Open via your library → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70091 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{sungchul2026,
title = {{Use of High‐ and Low‐Value Care Among Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries With and Without Medigap}},
author = {Sungchul Park & A. Mark Fendrick},
journal = {Health Services Research},
year = {2026},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70091},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Use of High‐ and Low‐Value Care Among Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries With and Without Medigap
AU - Park, Sungchul
AU - Fendrick, A. Mark
JO - Health Services Research
PY - 2026
ER - Sungchul Park & A. Mark Fendrick (2026). Use of High‐ and Low‐Value Care Among Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries With and Without Medigap. *Health Services Research*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70091 Sungchul Park & A. Mark Fendrick. "Use of High‐ and Low‐Value Care Among Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries With and Without Medigap." *Health Services Research* (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70091. Use of High‐ and Low‐Value Care Among Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries With and Without Medigap
Sungchul Park & A. Mark Fendrick · Health Services Research · 2026
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70091 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 M · momentum 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.