Use of High‐ and Low‐Value Care Among Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries With and Without Medigap

Sungchul Park & A. Mark Fendrick

Health Services Research2026https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70091article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Medigap coverage is associated with higher health care spending among TM beneficiaries, but does not consistently promote high- or low-value care. These findings highlight the need for policy reforms that provide incentives to supplemental insurance plans to encourage evidence-based service use and discourage spending on unnecessary care.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70091

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sungchul2026,
  title        = {{Use of High‐ and Low‐Value Care Among Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries With and Without Medigap}},
  author       = {Sungchul Park & A. Mark Fendrick},
  journal      = {Health Services Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70091},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Use of High‐ and Low‐Value Care Among Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries With and Without Medigap

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.