What is good government? comparing public values across three Confucian societies

Qinrou Zhou et al.

Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration2026https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2025.2612290article
AJG 1
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

What should a good government do? Answers to this question vary across institutional and cultural contexts, reflecting individuals’ underlying public values. This study examines how future public administrators–students majoring in public administration–perceive public values associated with a good government in China, Singapore, and Taiwan, three Confucian societies. Drawing on survey data from first-year public administration students and analysing differences using ANOVA and ANCOVA, we find that students prioritise government functions differently, with public sentiment strongly shaping their expectations. Certain societal dimensions–such as efficiency in China, public security in Singapore, and human rights in Taiwan–are highly prioritised, whereas others–such as equity in China, happiness in Singapore, and public security in Taiwan–receive relatively limited attention. This study contributes to comparative public administration by moving beyond East–West comparison and focusing on variations within Confucian societies. It has implications for public administration scholars and educators for a more balanced perspective about public values.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2025.2612290

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{qinrou2026,
  title        = {{What is good government? comparing public values across three Confucian societies}},
  author       = {Qinrou Zhou et al.},
  journal      = {Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2025.2612290},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

What is good government? comparing public values across three Confucian societies

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.