Dual-layer grouping consensus for decentralized federated learning

Min Li et al.

Computer Journal2026https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxag030article
AJG 2
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Federated learning has a reliance on centralized coordination, which brings several limitations (e.g. performance bottlenecks and single-point failures) and motivates the development of decentralized federated learning (DFL). In DFL, consensus mechanism plays a key role in ensuring reliable decentralized operation. Yet, existing consensus methods still struggle to balance multiple performance metrics and also face challenges such as insufficient diversity in consensus models. To address these challenges, the study proposes a dual-layer grouping consensus mechanism to balance various performance metrics, including accuracy and efficiency, while improving model diversity. Specifically, the implementation of the dual-layer grouping consensus mechanism is facilitated by a self-organizing grouping method to optimize group formation and a differentiated incentive mechanism to evaluate client performance. The experiments conducted on three datasets demonstrate that the framework delivers distinct outcomes: the global model gains a 3.47% accuracy increase, whereas the Efficiency Group specifically cuts time overhead to 56.61% of the best-performing baseline.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxag030

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{min2026,
  title        = {{Dual-layer grouping consensus for decentralized federated learning}},
  author       = {Min Li et al.},
  journal      = {Computer Journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxag030},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Dual-layer grouping consensus for decentralized federated learning

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.