Urgent samples in clinical laboratories: stochastic batching to minimize patient turnaround time

Antonín Novák et al.

Health Care Management Science2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-026-09756-8article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of batching laboratory samples in hospital laboratories where samples of different priorities are received continuously with uncertain transportation times. The focus is on optimizing the control strategy for loading a centrifuge to minimize patient turnaround time (TAT). While focusing on samples of patients in life-threatening situations (i.e., vital samples), we propose several online and offline methods, including a stochastic mixed-integer quadratic programming model integrated within a discrete-event system simulation. This paper aims to enhance patient care by providing timely laboratory results through improved batching strategies. The case study, which uses real data from a university hospital, demonstrates that incorporating distributional knowledge of transport times into our decision policy can reduce the median patient TAT of vital samples by 4.9 minutes and the 0.95 quantile by 9.7 minutes, but has no significant effect on low-priority samples. In addition, we show that this is essentially an optimal result by comparison with the upper bound obtained by a perfect-knowledge offline algorithm.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-026-09756-8

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{antonín2026,
  title        = {{Urgent samples in clinical laboratories: stochastic batching to minimize patient turnaround time}},
  author       = {Antonín Novák et al.},
  journal      = {Health Care Management Science},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-026-09756-8},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Urgent samples in clinical laboratories: stochastic batching to minimize patient turnaround time

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.