The impact of individual learning and organisational environmental turbulence on physician routine use of EHR

Michele Heath et al.

International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management2024https://doi.org/10.1504/ijhtm.2024.149027article
AJG 1
Weight
0.30

What the paper says

Electronic health records (EHRs) have yet to fully deliver on their promised benefits, and one possible reason is the lack of established routines for their use. We explore how physician individual learning influences the development of EHR routines and how organisational environmental turbulence disrupts this relationship. Our study tests the underlying relationships using survey data from 162 physicians in USA. The results demonstrate a positive relationship between individual learning and routine use of EHR. Our study also indicates that the relationship between individual learning and routine use is weaker when environmental turbulence is high. The paper discusses the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijhtm.2024.149027

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{michele2024,
  title        = {{The impact of individual learning and organisational environmental turbulence on physician routine use of EHR}},
  author       = {Michele Heath et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijhtm.2024.149027},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The impact of individual learning and organisational environmental turbulence on physician routine use of EHR

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.30

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.