Family Law for Family Life: Rethinking the Boundaries of Family Law

Leanne Smith

Current Legal Problems2025https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cuaf001article
ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

A key function of family law is to regulate family breakdown and conflict. Consequently, family law has been characterized as under threat as family disputes have been diverted from courts and lawyers, and its norms have become inaccessible to many. This article questions the scale of the threat. It argues for a rethinking of the boundaries of family law to shift focus away from dispute resolution and towards more constructive and anticipatory approaches. It shows how family law norms and rules might usefully be understood at the beginning of, or during, relationships. As such, the relevance of family law can be recaptured by seeing it as a tool for better informed—and perhaps normatively better—relationships over time; family law can be for family life, as well as family conflict. Finally, the article considers how contemporary shifts in the modalities of family law might be embraced and extended to accommodate a family law for family life agenda.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cuaf001

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{leanne2025,
  title        = {{Family Law for Family Life: Rethinking the Boundaries of Family Law}},
  author       = {Leanne Smith},
  journal      = {Current Legal Problems},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cuaf001},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Family Law for Family Life: Rethinking the Boundaries of Family Law

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.