arbiter
JournalsAccount

Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don’t: How Counterfactuals Shape Early-Stage Investment Decision-Making

Eduardo Andres Boada et al.

Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice2026https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587261419452article
FT50AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study explores the role of investors’ counterfactual thinking regarding errors of commission and omission and how these relate to willingness to invest in new ventures. Drawing from behavioral economics and psychology, we focus on the salience of prospective counterfactuals at the screening stage. Our experimental findings demonstrate that increasing the salience of commission-related counterfactuals, particularly social counterfactuals, significantly reduces investors’ willingness to invest. This effect underscores the influence of anticipated regret, social comparison, and emotional responses in shaping investment behavior. By contrast, omission-related counterfactuals show no measurable impact, suggesting a prevailing not-investing norm and limited effect of potential fear of missing out among new-venture investors. Our results provide a deeper understanding of how investors navigate the tension between avoiding missed opportunities and minimizing losses, emphasizing the salience of situational triggers as opposed to stable traits or market-wide factors. These insights highlight the importance of counterfactual thinking as a theoretical lens for studying decision-making in the high-risk, high-reward context of new-venture investing.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587261419452

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{eduardo2026,
  title        = {{Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don’t: How Counterfactuals Shape Early-Stage Investment Decision-Making}},
  author       = {Eduardo Andres Boada et al.},
  journal      = {Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587261419452},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don’t: How Counterfactuals Shape Early-Stage Investment Decision-Making

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.