Great expectations: a tale of two transitions—a survey of the evidence on expectations in transition economies

Daniele Girardi et al.

Journal of Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-025-00907-zarticle
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Over a quarter of the world’s population lives in countries that have undertaken transitions from central planning to some form of market-based coordination. These transitions entail far-reaching and complex economic and institutional changes and have had widely divergent trajectories. Important strands of literature have emphasised the many strategic complementarities that characterise the transition process. Contrary to a widespread assumption, new functioning economic institutions and a robust legal framework do not necessarily arise when property rights are reconfigured in a highly unstable and uncertain environment. Multiple equilibria emerge and expectations may play a key role in equilibrium selection. In this paper, we review the vast empirical literature on transition economies to provide comprehensive evidence about expectations at the beginning of transition, gathering and organising information from disparate studies across a wide set of countries. We thus provide the first comprehensive survey of the literature on agents’ subjective perceptions of transition paths.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-025-00907-z

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{daniele2025,
  title        = {{Great expectations: a tale of two transitions—a survey of the evidence on expectations in transition economies}},
  author       = {Daniele Girardi et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-025-00907-z},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Great expectations: a tale of two transitions—a survey of the evidence on expectations in transition economies

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.