Beyond the score: a structured NPS-based analytical framework for explanatory insight and continuous improvement
Jorge Ivan Pérez Rave et al.
What the paper says
Purpose This study aims to develop a structured analytical framework that extends the conventional descriptive use of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) toward diagnostic, confirmatory and institutionalized customer experience improvement. Design/methodology/approach A reproducible analytical-computational framework with four stages is proposed: Observe (control charts and capability analysis), Explore (causal segmentation using Gini-weighted decision trees, conditional probabilities and the Five Whys method), Confirm (non-parametric hypothesis testing with bootstrap procedures) and Institutionalize (standardization through structured templates and pedagogical strategies). The framework was validated in two organizational contexts, one service-based and one manufacturing-based. Findings The results of this study demonstrate that the proposed framework enables organizations to move from static NPS measurement toward a structured analytical workflow that supports diagnostic explanation, formal validation of interventions and systematic organizational learning. Across both cases, the framework showed methodological robustness, cross-sector applicability and pedagogical value. Originality/value This study offers a novel analytical–computational framework that transforms NPS from a passive indicator into a dynamic mechanism for explaining, validating and institutionalizing customer experience improvements. By integrating exploratory, confirmatory and learning-oriented analytics within a unified structure, the framework advances the methodological role of NPS in both customer experience research and practice.
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
| M · momentum | 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.