Artificial intelligence method for extracting knowledge from security experts to assess SMEs' information systems

Inès Saad & Wafa Bouaynaya

International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies2026https://doi.org/10.1504/ijkms.2026.152469article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This research investigates the possibility of utilising the implicit and explicit knowledge of cybersecurity professionals in order to help small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs) in assessing the level of security that their information and knowledge systems possess. A dominance-based rough set approach serves as the foundation for the proposed strategy, which consists of two primary stages. In order to generate three ordered decision classes, the first phase requires the construction of a set of criteria and preference models, which are guided by seasoned security specialists. Validation of this preference model is performed with the help of test data during the second step. Forty-three small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and 15 cybersecurity specialists participated in the testing of the method. By taking this method, firm managers are able to better anticipate cybersecurity risks, provide a comprehensive review of information system security, and reduce the likelihood of cyberattacks.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijkms.2026.152469

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{inès2026,
  title        = {{Artificial intelligence method for extracting knowledge from security experts to assess SMEs' information systems}},
  author       = {Inès Saad & Wafa Bouaynaya},
  journal      = {International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijkms.2026.152469},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Artificial intelligence method for extracting knowledge from security experts to assess SMEs' information systems

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.