Navigating Dual Identity: A Comparative Study of Research Development in Sino-Foreign Cooperative Universities

Kai Zhao et al.

Higher Education Policy2026https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-026-00438-2article
AJG 2
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study examines the research development of Sino-foreign cooperative universities (SFCUs) in China, analyzing how these institutions navigate their dual identity within global academic standards and local higher education systems. Using comprehensive data from SciVal covering nine SFCUs from 2014 to 2023, we analyze research output, impact, collaboration patterns, and funding sources, comparing performance with established Project 985 and 211 universities. Despite producing smaller publication volumes than established Chinese universities, SFCUs demonstrate comparable or superior research quality metrics. SFCUs exhibit distinctive collaboration patterns, maintaining international collaboration rates above 56% compared to approximately 30% for traditional Chinese universities. However, longitudinal analysis reveals evolving strategies, with most SFCUs gradually increasing national collaboration while maintaining strong international connections. Institutional partnerships and funding sources reveal significant variation in balancing global integration and local responsiveness, with the National Natural Science Foundation of China emerging as the dominant funding source across all institutions. Our findings challenge simplified characterizations of dual identity, revealing it as a dynamic, multidimensional phenomenon that evolves over time.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-026-00438-2

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kai2026,
  title        = {{Navigating Dual Identity: A Comparative Study of Research Development in Sino-Foreign Cooperative Universities}},
  author       = {Kai Zhao et al.},
  journal      = {Higher Education Policy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-026-00438-2},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Navigating Dual Identity: A Comparative Study of Research Development in Sino-Foreign Cooperative Universities

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.