Capital Market Consequences Of Expectations Management In The Postregulation Fair Disclosure Period
Sherry Fang Li
What the paper says
This paper investigates the capital market consequences of expectations management in the postRegulation Fair Disclosure period. Results show that investors punish firms that deliberately issue pessimistic public guidance to dampen analysts’ expectations to a beatable level in the post-Regulation Fair Disclosure Era. I find that on average, the negative stock price effects caused by management’s pessimistic guidance dominate the positive stock price effects associated with the positive earnings surprises. Furthermore, both the short-term stock return over the combined guidance plus earnings announcement window and the long-term total period return are more negative for guidance firms than for firms that do not guide and thus miss financial analysts’ expectations
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00 |
| M · momentum | 0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.