arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Procedural and Distributive Justice in Sexual Harassment Arbitrations: Evolution of Decisions in the Union Context

Steven E. Abraham & Paula B. Voos

Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations2021https://doi.org/10.1108/s0742-618620210000026004book-chapter
AJG 1
Weight
0.26

What the paper says

We examine the evolution of labor arbitration decisions between 1988 and 2018 in which a union-represented employee was alleged to have committed sexual harassment. We find that management punished sexual harassment more stringently over time and that arbitrators became more sensitive to whether or not good procedure was followed by management over time. Distributive justice was also a major concern for arbitrators. The results suggest that it is essential for management to exercise procedural justice in disciplining employees, but that it is just as important for management to consider distributive justice when it comes to imposing discipline for inappropriate behavior.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s0742-618620210000026004

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{steven2021,
  title        = {{Procedural and Distributive Justice in Sexual Harassment Arbitrations: Evolution of Decisions in the Union Context}},
  author       = {Steven E. Abraham & Paula B. Voos},
  journal      = {Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations},
  year         = {2021},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s0742-618620210000026004},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Procedural and Distributive Justice in Sexual Harassment Arbitrations: Evolution of Decisions in the Union Context

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.