arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing: Community Meetings and Voter Control in Non-Democracies

Thorsten Rogall

Quarterly Journal of Political Science2025https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00021158article
AJG 3ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

How can autocratic leaders influence voters and entrench their rule? I analyze a Rwandan mandatory community program that requires citizens to participate in local community work every last Saturday of the month. Following the work, a centrally appointed government leader usually delivers a speech. I exploit cross-sectional variation in exposure to the meetings induced by exogenous rainfall fluctuations. I find that places with many rainy last-of-the-month Saturdays are significantly less likely to vote for the leading party. In terms of mechanisms, additional suggestive evidence points to the meetings likely being used to create an atmosphere of state control and supervision such that people feel more inclined to vote for the ruling party. These findings are also supported by anecdotal evidence and I rule out alternative explanations.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00021158

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{thorsten2025,
  title        = {{Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing: Community Meetings and Voter Control in Non-Democracies}},
  author       = {Thorsten Rogall},
  journal      = {Quarterly Journal of Political Science},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00021158},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing: Community Meetings and Voter Control in Non-Democracies

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.