Inclusive Conservation or Controlled Displacement? Reassessing Community Participation in China’s Ecological Migration Programmes

Siyang Li

China Report2026https://doi.org/10.1177/00094455251403084article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study examines the extent and implications of community participation in the decision-making and governance processes surrounding ecological relocation induced by the establishment of protected areas. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with government officials, community representatives and relocated residents in two counties within the planning area of the Giant Panda National Park, the research finds that the quality of participation largely hinges on the localisation of policy implementation and the representativeness of community intermediaries. Although official narratives stress the voluntary nature of relocation, China’s distinctive rural governance structure tends to amplify the authority of community representatives, often at the expense of adequately reflecting residents’ voices and concerns. While the overall effectiveness of participatory approaches remains contested, recent innovations in institutional design have opened up new avenues for community involvement in protected area governance. This study contributes to the literature by shedding light on livelihood transformations and governance dynamics in resettled communities, and identifies potential entry points for enhancing local governance and collaborative management of protected areas.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00094455251403084

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{siyang2026,
  title        = {{Inclusive Conservation or Controlled Displacement? Reassessing Community Participation in China’s Ecological Migration Programmes}},
  author       = {Siyang Li},
  journal      = {China Report},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00094455251403084},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Inclusive Conservation or Controlled Displacement? Reassessing Community Participation in China’s Ecological Migration Programmes

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.