“Global value chains in a brave new world of geopolitics”

Etel Solingen

Journal of Political Power2025https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379x.2024.2447249article
ABDC C
Weight
0.48

What the paper says

Global value chains (GVCs) tightened economic interdependence and contributed to development in industrialized and industrializing states. Yet GVCs are progressively perceived as underpinning a country’s economic prowess and its ability to leverage technologies into military hardware and software, thus embodying hard and soft power. Providing a framework for understanding the domestic sources of this protectionist shift, the article analyzes the evolving GVC topography under the US-China trade and technology war. It finds that GVCs remained resilient to geopolitical and pandemic shocks until Russia’s assault on Ukraine, the deepest blow to the the ante-bellum GVC structure. China’s policy of maximizing GVC self-reliance under Xi Jinping triggered reactions by the US and allies. The battle over GVCs is far from over, its scope remains undefined, and its effects hard to estimate. Whether or not this battle enhances hard power, it also unleashes tradeoffs between hard and soft power.

5 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379x.2024.2447249

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{etel2025,
  title        = {{“Global value chains in a brave new world of geopolitics”}},
  author       = {Etel Solingen},
  journal      = {Journal of Political Power},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379x.2024.2447249},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

“Global value chains in a brave new world of geopolitics”

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.48

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.41 × 0.4 = 0.16
M · momentum0.63 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.