arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Coaching psychology and climate change

Manfusa Shams

International Coaching Psychology Review2026https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsicpr.2026.21.1.6article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Coaching psychology can play a major role to address climate change effects, impact and consequences. There has been an increasing interest to develop and support coaching practice for climate change issues around the world. This article aims to open the discussion about three critical questions to understand the valuable role of coaching psychology to address the effects and consequences of climate change. These three questions are, 1) what do we know about climate change and coaching psychology? 2) why coaching psychology is important for climate change? 3) how coaching psychology can address the negative effect of climate change on behaviour? This short article calls for professional interventions from coaching psychology practice for supporting responses to climate change using coaching psychology driven knowledge, tools and techniques, with an aim to support individuals, groups and nations to cope with the ongoing and unpredictable changes in the climate.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsicpr.2026.21.1.6

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{manfusa2026,
  title        = {{Coaching psychology and climate change}},
  author       = {Manfusa Shams},
  journal      = {International Coaching Psychology Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsicpr.2026.21.1.6},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Coaching psychology and climate change

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.