arbiter
JournalsAccount

Understanding walking route choice preferences and pedestrian network flows: From individual trajectories to city-scale patterns using empirical data from Sydney

Tanapon Lilasathapornkit et al.

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2026.104985article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of built environment factors on pedestrian route choices in an urban context using passively collected mobile phone trajectory data from Sydney, Australia. We estimate and compare multiple discrete choice models including C-Logit, Path Size Logit (PSL), and Error Component (EC) models to quantify associations between pedestrian route choices and route characteristics such as distance, slope, turns, crossings, amenities, and greenery. The models are applied to a high-resolution sidewalk network to simulate pedestrian flows across the city. Our findings are broadly consistent with existing literature, highlighting the importance of route simplicity, directness, and terrain in walking behavior. A key contribution of this study is the integration of passively collected GPS trajectories with route choice modeling and network-level flow assignment, demonstrating a scalable framework for understanding and forecasting pedestrian behavior. The approach enables city-scale assessments of pedestrian infrastructure and offers valuable insights for data-driven planning of walkable urban environments.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2026.104985

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{tanapon2026,
  title        = {{Understanding walking route choice preferences and pedestrian network flows: From individual trajectories to city-scale patterns using empirical data from Sydney}},
  author       = {Tanapon Lilasathapornkit et al.},
  journal      = {Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2026.104985},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Understanding walking route choice preferences and pedestrian network flows: From individual trajectories to city-scale patterns using empirical data from Sydney

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.