Due Diligence in International Alliances: Performance Outcomes and the Moderating Effect of Geographic Distance and Partner-Specific Experience

Catherine Elizabeth Georgiou et al.

Management International Review2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-025-00604-5article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

There is a general assumption in the literature that due diligence is a vital ex ante step in alliance formation. However, the actual relationship between alliance performance and due diligence has not been empirically studied. Drawing on theoretical insights from information economics, we address this issue in international alliances, considering each party’s due diligence investigations. Demonstrating that due diligence is indeed beneficial for performance, we go a step further and show that this beneficial effect is negatively moderated where contextual factors affect the information environment. We find that both geographic distance which increases information asymmetries and partner-specific experience which decreases information asymmetries lessen the value generation potential of due diligence. This paper thus confirms the assumption in the literature and also introduces contextual limitations. This paper therefore helps address the cost–benefit scenario of due diligence.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-025-00604-5

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{catherine2026,
  title        = {{Due Diligence in International Alliances: Performance Outcomes and the Moderating Effect of Geographic Distance and Partner-Specific Experience}},
  author       = {Catherine Elizabeth Georgiou et al.},
  journal      = {Management International Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-025-00604-5},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Due Diligence in International Alliances: Performance Outcomes and the Moderating Effect of Geographic Distance and Partner-Specific Experience

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.