The Augmented Hat‐Matrix of Hierarchical Generalised Linear Models and Its Use in Leverage Diagnostics

Gianfranco Lovison et al.

International Statistical Review2026https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.70030article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Summary Defining a ‘hat‐matrix’ for a model is essential in many model diagnostic procedures, as it acts as an orthogonal projector from the observation space to the model space. In this paper, we introduce a unique Hat‐matrix for the class of hierarchical generalised linear models (HGLMs), which includes, as a special case, the subclass of generalised linear mixed models (GLMMs). We provide a practical discussion on interpreting the hat matrix values in HGLMs across various settings, aimed at assisting practitioners in model diagnostics. Additionally, we propose two new empirical thresholds to identify high‐leverage observations and clusters. We demonstrate the advantages of using these empirical thresholds over the traditional approach with a simulation study. Lastly, we present an application to real data to illustrate the effectiveness of our proposed methodology in real‐world scenarios.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.70030

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{gianfranco2026,
  title        = {{The Augmented Hat‐Matrix of Hierarchical Generalised Linear Models and Its Use in Leverage Diagnostics}},
  author       = {Gianfranco Lovison et al.},
  journal      = {International Statistical Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.70030},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Augmented Hat‐Matrix of Hierarchical Generalised Linear Models and Its Use in Leverage Diagnostics

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.