Five peelers, 5,000 potatoes: How collaborative cooking and eating in the Woodcraft Folk is building co-operation from the ground up

Anna Blewett

Journal of Co-operative Studies2025https://doi.org/10.61869/hgam9273article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This short article explores the potential of ‘clans’ — mixed-aged working parties responsible for preparing, serving and clearing up after meals — to embed multi-generational co-operation at Woodcraft Folk camps. These residential events, where children and young people greatly outnumber responsible adults, are shaped by the need for sustenance, shelter, purpose, and a sense of belonging; this amounts to a huge amount of physical and emotional labour. Amid (perhaps because of) these conditions, the Woodcraft Folk model of clans creates significant displays of creative collaboration, joint problem solving, and peer-to-peer support. The experiences of Wivenhoe Woodcraft Folk in Essex suggests the perennial obstacles to and opportunities of co-operation play out most positively in tiny ad‑hoc field kitchens, embedding a habit of collaborative thinking and acting in our young people.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61869/hgam9273

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{anna2025,
  title        = {{Five peelers, 5,000 potatoes: How collaborative cooking and eating in the Woodcraft Folk is building co-operation from the ground up}},
  author       = {Anna Blewett},
  journal      = {Journal of Co-operative Studies},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61869/hgam9273},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Five peelers, 5,000 potatoes: How collaborative cooking and eating in the Woodcraft Folk is building co-operation from the ground up

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.