arbiter
JournalsAccount

Sharing the Pain: The U.S.–China Trade War and the Narrowing of the Intra‐Firm Wage Gap in China

Xiaoxia Zhao et al.

International Finance2026https://doi.org/10.1111/infi.70031article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of the U.S.–China trade shock on intra‐firm pay inequality in China. Using a sample of Chinese A‐share listed firms from 2015 to 2021, we employ a multi‐period difference‐in‐differences framework that exploits industry‐level tariff exposure as a quasi‐natural experiment. Our results reveal that the trade shock significantly suppresses both average wages and the vertical wage dispersion between executives and rank‐and‐file employees. This risk‐sharing effect is more pronounced in state‐owned enterprises and high‐R&D‐intensive firms. Mechanism analysis indicates that the trade friction narrowed wage disparities primarily by tightening firms' financing constraints and reducing internal cash flows. These findings suggest that in response to major external shocks, internal compensation structures may be shaped more by considerations of organizational stability and cohesion than by managerial power alone.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/infi.70031

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{xiaoxia2026,
  title        = {{Sharing the Pain: The U.S.–China Trade War and the Narrowing of the Intra‐Firm Wage Gap in China}},
  author       = {Xiaoxia Zhao et al.},
  journal      = {International Finance},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/infi.70031},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Sharing the Pain: The U.S.–China Trade War and the Narrowing of the Intra‐Firm Wage Gap in China

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.