Collaborative craftmanship; how restaurant workers articulate good professional practice in a changing society

Erna Håland

Tourism and Hospitality Research2026https://doi.org/10.1177/14673584261416890article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The restaurant industry represents an extensive part of the hospitality sector and is known for long hours and tough working conditions, a low unionisation rate, low pay and high turnover, but less attention has been paid to what they do well – to perceptions of good professional practice in this industry. This article makes a contribution in this respect, as it explores how restaurant workers articulate what good professional practice in the restaurant industry means to them. Based on qualitative interviews with 16 restaurant workers (managers, chefs, waiters and apprentices) and additional observations in four different restaurants in Norway, the article investigates how the restaurant workers understand and define good professional practice in the restaurant industry. The study finds that collaborative work is at the very core of the professional identity of these restaurant workers, a collaborative craftmanship, and questions how this might be challenged by a more individualistic society with more individualistically oriented restaurant workers. This implies that the restaurant industry needs to adapt to these changes and develop new strategies in order to attract and keep competent restaurant workers.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14673584261416890

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{erna2026,
  title        = {{Collaborative craftmanship; how restaurant workers articulate good professional practice in a changing society}},
  author       = {Erna Håland},
  journal      = {Tourism and Hospitality Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14673584261416890},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Collaborative craftmanship; how restaurant workers articulate good professional practice in a changing society

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.