arbiter
JournalsAccount

Interplay Between Competition Networks, Strategy Uniqueness, and Hedge Fund Performance

Maher Kooli & Min Zhang

Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments2025https://doi.org/10.1111/fmii.70001article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of competition networks among hedge fund managers on strategy distinctiveness and fund performance. Using a sample of 2711 US‐based hedge funds from the Lipper TASS database between 1994 and 2018, we construct a hedge fund competition network (HFCN) based on alumni and employment ties derived from LinkedIn profiles. We find that greater centrality in the HFCN, indicating closer proximity to peer competitors, is associated with lower abnormal performance. This effect is partially mediated by a decline in strategy distinctiveness, measured by the Strategy Distinctiveness Index (SDI). Funds with stronger network ties tend to exhibit greater return similarity with peers, suggesting that social proximity encourages strategic conformity. The results are robust across performance metrics, style classifications, and subsamples and are particularly pronounced among managers with strong cognitive profiles.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/fmii.70001

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{maher2025,
  title        = {{Interplay Between Competition Networks, Strategy Uniqueness, and Hedge Fund Performance}},
  author       = {Maher Kooli & Min Zhang},
  journal      = {Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/fmii.70001},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Interplay Between Competition Networks, Strategy Uniqueness, and Hedge Fund Performance

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.