Unified brand strategy and operation quality of business group: evidence from stock price crash risk

Cheng Zhang et al.

China Journal of Accounting Studies2025https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2025.2453683article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Under the framework of a reputation governance mechanism, this paper analyzes how the unified brand strategy (UBS) impacts the operation quality of business groups. Evidence indicates that a higher degree of brand unity reduces the stock price crash risk, thereby enhancing operational quality. Cross-sectional analysis further supports the reputation theory, showing that the negative correlation between UBS and stock price crash risk is significant when the group receives high professional attention and has a strong brand reputation. The study also finds that UBS improves earnings quality, profitability, and earnings sustainability, further boosting operational quality. These findings provide important guidance for China’s rapid and stable development of the brand economy and the construction of a unified national market.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2025.2453683

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{cheng2025,
  title        = {{Unified brand strategy and operation quality of business group: evidence from stock price crash risk}},
  author       = {Cheng Zhang et al.},
  journal      = {China Journal of Accounting Studies},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2025.2453683},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Unified brand strategy and operation quality of business group: evidence from stock price crash risk

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.