Decolonizing the public sphere(s)?: A historical trajectory of justice-seeking subaltern public communication in the Middle East

Burçe Çelik

Communication Theory2025https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaf004article
ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

While the discourse surrounding “decolonizing” risks becoming an abstract notion, the imperative to challenge the monopoly of Eurocentric knowledge systems remains urgent. Committed to the necessity of critical public communication that serves most of the world, the article aims to make a decolonizing intervention into the dominant discussions of critical public communication, which are still largely governed by theories of the public sphere(s). Rather than providing another critique of these theories, I propose an alternative concept: justice-seeking communication. Justice-seeking communication is a historical episteme and practice of the subaltern populations of the Middle East, uniting them as a reasoning, debating, and justice-demanding public in the face of injustices they encountered and defined as rectifiable oppression through their collective agency. Following a brief historical examination of Middle Eastern petitions and coffeehouses, I discuss how the justice-seeking communicative praxis of subaltern populations can inform our future imaginations of pluriversal critical public communication.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaf004

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{burçe2025,
  title        = {{Decolonizing the public sphere(s)?: A historical trajectory of justice-seeking subaltern public communication in the Middle East}},
  author       = {Burçe Çelik},
  journal      = {Communication Theory},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaf004},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Decolonizing the public sphere(s)?: A historical trajectory of justice-seeking subaltern public communication in the Middle East

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.