Demand for Home Pension and Reverse Mortgage: An Information Provision Survey Experiment

Duk Gyoo Kim & In Do Hwang

The BE Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy2026https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2025-0299article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Population aging and the sustainability of retirement financing are critical challenges facing many developed economies. In South Korea, elderly poverty remains a critical issue, despite widespread homeownership among older adults. Although the home pension program allows retirees to unlock housing wealth, uptake remains below 2 % as of 2024. Using a large-scale survey of adults aged 55–79, we conduct an information provision experiment to assess how policy reforms and belief corrections affect demand. We find that enrollment intention rises by 6 percentage points when monthly pension payments are adjusted with house price changes, and by 5 percentage points when bequest conditions are made more flexible. Notably, merely informing that the fixed monthly payments – often perceived as disadvantageous during housing price increases – do not result in a loss when house prices rise because the amount bequeathed to their children increases accordingly, led to a 7 %p increase in enrollment intention. Our results suggest that addressing informational barriers may be as effective as structural reforms in increasing program uptake.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2025-0299

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{duk2026,
  title        = {{Demand for Home Pension and Reverse Mortgage: An Information Provision Survey Experiment}},
  author       = {Duk Gyoo Kim & In Do Hwang},
  journal      = {The BE Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2025-0299},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Demand for Home Pension and Reverse Mortgage: An Information Provision Survey Experiment

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.