arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Object and Effects Tests in Resale Price Maintenance Cases in China

Heng Ju & Meitong Li

Journal of Competition Law and Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhae021article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

The legal rules toward RPM in China are undergoing a major change. Reflecting the classical disputes over the issues in major competition jurisdictions, the change highlights the importance of an effect-based approach. We summarize how RPM had been regulated in China under the jurisdiction of Anti-Monopoly Law. We also discuss the potential switch to an “effect-based” approach and the likely reliance on economic analysis in the future, through a systematic study of all the 45 RPM cases in China between 2008 and 2022.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhae021

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{heng2025,
  title        = {{Object and Effects Tests in Resale Price Maintenance Cases in China}},
  author       = {Heng Ju & Meitong Li},
  journal      = {Journal of Competition Law and Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhae021},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Object and Effects Tests in Resale Price Maintenance Cases in China

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.