arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Funding acknowledgements and funding concentration in the social sciences and humanities: ‘ <i>a tale of two unis</i> ’

Alesia Zuccala

Research Evaluation2026https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvag013article
AJG 2ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract Funding allocation in academia reflects broader disciplinary hierarchies and systemic inequalities, particularly within the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH). This study investigates patterns of funding acknowledgments and funding concentration in the SSH at two universities (University of Copenhagen; University of Toronto) over a 20-year period (2002–22). Using Scopus-indexed journal article data, we analyse the proportion of acknowledged funded versus non-funded research, the distribution of funding sources, and the extent to which funding is concentrated towards specific authors and research topics. Our findings reveal significant disparities in funding allocation, with a small subset of authors benefitting from a disproportionate share of funding. We also observe a strong correlation between interdisciplinary research and funding success, suggesting that SSH scholars have enhanced their funding prospects by aligning their work with applied, policy-relevant, or STEM-adjacent domains.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvag013

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{alesia2026,
  title        = {{Funding acknowledgements and funding concentration in the social sciences and humanities: ‘ <i>a tale of two unis</i> ’}},
  author       = {Alesia Zuccala},
  journal      = {Research Evaluation},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvag013},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Funding acknowledgements and funding concentration in the social sciences and humanities: ‘ <i>a tale of two unis</i> ’

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.