arbiter
JournalsAccount

Design-based Causal Inference for Incomplete Block Designs

Taehyeon Koo & Nicole E. Pashley

Biometrika2026https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asag013article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Researchers often turn to block randomization to increase the precision of their inference or due to practical considerations, such as in multisite trials. However, if the number of treatments under consideration is large it might not be feasible or practical to assign all treatments within each block. We develop novel inference results under the finite-population design-based framework for natural alternatives to the complete block design that do not require reducing the number of treatment arms, the incomplete block design and the balanced incomplete block design. This includes deriving the properties of two design-based estimators, developing a finite-population central limit theorem, and proposing conservative variance estimators.Comparisons of the design-based estimators are made to linear model-based estimators. Simulations and a data illustration further demonstrate performance of incomplete block design estimators. This work highlights incomplete block designs as practical and currently underutilized designs.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asag013

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{taehyeon2026,
  title        = {{Design-based Causal Inference for Incomplete Block Designs}},
  author       = {Taehyeon Koo & Nicole E. Pashley},
  journal      = {Biometrika},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asag013},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Design-based Causal Inference for Incomplete Block Designs

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.