arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

How to Escape from Model Platonism in Economics: Critical Assumptions, Robust Conclusions, and Approximate Explanations

Max Albert

Homo Oeconomicus2022https://doi.org/10.1007/s41412-022-00122-xarticle
ABDC C
Weight
0.75

What the paper says

Abstract About sixty years ago, Hans Albert criticized economists for their “model platonism”, a methodological attitude that immunizes theoretical models against empirical criticism. Since then, economics has taken an empirical turn; yet, model platonism lingers on. The root of the problem is economists’ reluctance to distinguish explicitly between the law-like and the situational assumptions of their models. Without this distinction, it is impossible to give a satisfactory account of the interplay between theory and empirical investigations. Based on Hans Albert’s critical rationalism, the paper explains how making the distinction allows economists to escape from model platonism. By identifying critical situational assumptions and robust conclusions, economists can, and sometimes do, find approximate explanations even though they cannot completely avoid unrealistic simplifications.

5 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s41412-022-00122-x

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{max2022,
  title        = {{How to Escape from Model Platonism in Economics: Critical Assumptions, Robust Conclusions, and Approximate Explanations}},
  author       = {Max Albert},
  journal      = {Homo Oeconomicus},
  year         = {2022},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s41412-022-00122-x},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

How to Escape from Model Platonism in Economics: Critical Assumptions, Robust Conclusions, and Approximate Explanations

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.75

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact1.00 × 0.4 = 0.40
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.