The statistical physics of psychological networks: Zero matters.

Han L. J. van der Maas et al.

Psychological Review2026https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000611article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Psychological network theories provide an important alternative to traditional common cause theories, such as the g-theory of general intelligence and brain-based explanations of depression. Network theories, which are often formalized using the Ising model from statistical physics, have gained significant empirical support. However, the binary nature of nodes in Ising-type models presents a limitation, as many psychological data sets include responses with uncertain or neutral categories (e.g., "don't know" or "not relevant"). Ternary spin models, such as the Blume-Capel model, overcome this constraint by incorporating a third node state, zero, that can represent such responses, enabling more nuanced scale representations. The resulting models exhibit more complex dynamics and provide new insights into research across a range of psychological constructs. We illustrate our approach with examples from three key subdisciplines of psychology. First, we introduce a ternary spin model for attitudes, extending the Ising attitude model. Next, we propose a unified framework encompassing both bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. Finally, we present a novel ternary network model for understanding knowledge acquisition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000611

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{han2026,
  title        = {{The statistical physics of psychological networks: Zero matters.}},
  author       = {Han L. J. van der Maas et al.},
  journal      = {Psychological Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000611},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The statistical physics of psychological networks: Zero matters.

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.