Carbon pricing in agriculture: a systematic literature review

Daniela Tatiane de Souza et al.

Brazilian Journal of Rural Economy and Sociology2025https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9479.2025.288293article
ABDC C
Weight
0.44

What the paper says

Abstract Carbon pricing involves assigning a monetary value to greenhouse gas emissions. This paper systematically reviews the state of carbon pricing in global agriculture over a 20-year period. Based on a systematic literature review, carbon valuation methods were correlated with prices attributed to determinants identified in academic publications, as well as extrapolated to the Brazilian agricultural environment. There was variation in carbon prices (minimum of USD 2.6/tCO2e and maximum of USD 157.5/tCO2e), determined by different socio-economic, agricultural and geographical heterogeneities. Our results showed negative relationship between Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita and CO2 emissions per capita, indicating high elasticity of emissions in response to changes in carbon prices. There was also positive relationship between nitrogen fertilizer use per capita and carbon price. In 2021, the estimated carbon value for Brazilian agriculture using quantile regression was USD 11.54/tCO2e. It is therefore critical that scientifically robust carbon pricing methodologies be applied to agriculture to serve as benchmarks for national environmental valuation systems.

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9479.2025.288293

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{daniela2025,
  title        = {{Carbon pricing in agriculture: a systematic literature review}},
  author       = {Daniela Tatiane de Souza et al.},
  journal      = {Brazilian Journal of Rural Economy and Sociology},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9479.2025.288293},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Carbon pricing in agriculture: a systematic literature review

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.