arbiter
JournalsAccount

Pension underfunding and the expected return on pension assets: The impact of the 2008 financial crisis

Alexander Michaelides et al.

Journal of Risk and Insurance2025https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.70003article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.46

Abstract

We use the 2008 crisis as an exogenous shock to the pension funding status of U.S. corporate defined benefit (DB) pension plans to examine its impact on the assumption of the expected return on pension assets ( ER ). Contrary to prior literature, we find that DB pension plans transitioning from funded to underfunded status make expense‐reducing assumptions by increasing their ER . We also document that the ER manipulation is larger for plans whose funding after 2008 drops significantly. The funding deterioration conservatively generates a 28–79 basis points increase in ER , reducing the pension accounting expense by about 5.23%–14.76% ($3.49 to $9.85 million). Our results are robust to controlling for the shock induced by the global financial crisis on corporate performance and other potential channels affecting ER .

4 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.70003

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{alexander2025,
  title        = {{Pension underfunding and the expected return on pension assets: The impact of the 2008 financial crisis}},
  author       = {Alexander Michaelides et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Risk and Insurance},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.70003},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Pension underfunding and the expected return on pension assets: The impact of the 2008 financial crisis

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.46

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.37 × 0.4 = 0.15
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.