Peer Perspectives on Employee Idiosyncratic Deals

J. Lee & Hyesook Chung

Seoul Journal of Business2019https://doi.org/10.35152/snusjb.2019.25.1.001article
ABDC C
Weight
0.40

What the paper says

In this paper, we attempt to describe the relationship between the observation of coworker idiosyncratic deals (i-deals: Rousseau et al., 2006; Rousseau, 2005) and employee turnover intention by incorporating two explanatory mechanisms: workplace flexibility and procedural justice. We hypothesize contrasting implications of coworker flexibility i-deals and developmental i-deals on these two mediating mechanisms. Based on a sample of 176 employees, we find differential implications for the two types of i-deals and mediators. We discuss these findings and the implications of our research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Seoul Journal of Business is the property of Seoul National University, College of Business Administration and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

4 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35152/snusjb.2019.25.1.001

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{j.2019,
  title        = {{Peer Perspectives on Employee Idiosyncratic Deals}},
  author       = {J. Lee & Hyesook Chung},
  journal      = {Seoul Journal of Business},
  year         = {2019},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35152/snusjb.2019.25.1.001},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Peer Perspectives on Employee Idiosyncratic Deals

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.40

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.14 × 0.4 = 0.05
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.