← Back to results Some guidance for the choice of priors for Bayesian structural models in economic experiments James R. Bland
Abstract Bayesian estimates from experimental data can be influenced by highly diffuse or “uninformative” priors. This paper gives examples of how diffuse priors can affect estimates, and discusses how practitioners can use their expertise to critique and select a prior. 1
1 citation
Open in an MCP-compatible agent ↗
Open via your library → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/esa.2025.6 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{james2025,
title = {{Some guidance for the choice of priors for Bayesian structural models in economic experiments}},
author = {James R. Bland},
journal = {Journal of Economic Science Association},
year = {2025},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/esa.2025.6},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Some guidance for the choice of priors for Bayesian structural models in economic experiments
AU - Bland, James R.
JO - Journal of Economic Science Association
PY - 2025
ER - James R. Bland (2025). Some guidance for the choice of priors for Bayesian structural models in economic experiments. *Journal of Economic Science Association*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/esa.2025.6 James R. Bland. "Some guidance for the choice of priors for Bayesian structural models in economic experiments." *Journal of Economic Science Association* (2025). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/esa.2025.6. Some guidance for the choice of priors for Bayesian structural models in economic experiments
James R. Bland · Journal of Economic Science Association · 2025
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/esa.2025.6 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06 M · momentum 0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.