← Back to results Palladino, Lenore. Good Company: Economic Policy after Shareholder Primacy Ryan Bubb
Abstract Ryan Bubb of University of Southern California reviews “Good Company: Economic Policy after Shareholder Primacy” by Lenore Palladino. The Econlit abstract of this book begins: “Explores how ending shareholder primacy and reorienting corporate decision-making toward productivity would work in practice, focusing on how board members, employees, managers, shareholders, customers, and the broader public would understand their rights and responsibilities if they were operating together in pursuit of economic innovation.”
Open in an MCP-compatible agent ↗
Open via your library → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.64.1.301.r7 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{ryan2026,
title = {{Palladino, Lenore. Good Company: Economic Policy after Shareholder Primacy}},
author = {Ryan Bubb},
journal = {Journal of Economic Literature},
year = {2026},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.64.1.301.r7},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Palladino, Lenore. Good Company: Economic Policy after Shareholder Primacy
AU - Bubb, Ryan
JO - Journal of Economic Literature
PY - 2026
ER - Ryan Bubb (2026). Palladino, Lenore. Good Company: Economic Policy after Shareholder Primacy. *Journal of Economic Literature*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.64.1.301.r7 Ryan Bubb. "Palladino, Lenore. Good Company: Economic Policy after Shareholder Primacy." *Journal of Economic Literature* (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.64.1.301.r7. Palladino, Lenore. Good Company: Economic Policy after Shareholder Primacy
Ryan Bubb · Journal of Economic Literature · 2026
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.64.1.301.r7 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 M · momentum 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.