arbiter
JournalsAccount

Different Aspirations, Different Directions: A Behavioural Perspective on Negative Performance Discrepancy and Problemistic Search

William C. Zhou

Journal of Management Studies2026https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.70099article
FT50AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Although the behavioural theory of the firm (BTOF) literature argues that negative performance discrepancy triggers problemistic search, whether and how negative social versus historical performance discrepancy differ in their impact on such search—and how managers prioritize between these two aspirations—remains unclear. Drawing on the BTOF and temporal focus literature, we posit that negative social performance discrepancy leads to an increase in search scope, while negative historical performance discrepancy leads to an increase in search depth. We further find that CEO temporal focus moderates these relationships: the link between negative social performance discrepancy and search scope is stronger under CEOs high in present focus, whereas the link between negative historical performance discrepancy and search depth is stronger under CEOs high in past focus. Our findings contribute to the BTOF literature by clarifying the distinct roles of historical and social aspirations in problemistic search and by incorporating temporal focus in performance feedback studies.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.70099

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{william2026,
  title        = {{Different Aspirations, Different Directions: A Behavioural Perspective on Negative Performance Discrepancy and Problemistic Search}},
  author       = {William C. Zhou},
  journal      = {Journal of Management Studies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.70099},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Different Aspirations, Different Directions: A Behavioural Perspective on Negative Performance Discrepancy and Problemistic Search

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.