Considerations for a Post-Pandemic Monetary Policy Framework

Charles L. Evans

Brookings Papers on Economic Activity2024https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2024.a965431article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.55

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The Federal Reserve's 2020 strategic framework for monetary policy is sufficiently broad and flexible to face up to the wide-ranging challenges and uncertainties that are likely to emerge over the next many years. The 2020 revised framework addressed challenges that surfaced under the 2012 strategy and effective lower bound complications following the global financial crisis. Additions in the 2020 framework were intended to further anchor inflation expectations and preserve as much interest rate capacity to fight emerging recessions as a 2 percent inflation objective allows. I review the rationale for the inclusion of flexible average inflation targeting and refocusing on employment shortfalls. While the 2020 framework remains a sturdy foundation for monetary policymaking, I discuss implementation issues and suggest a few improvement opportunities that may help combat the challenges arising from the choice of a low 2 percent inflation objective.

3 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2024.a965431

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{charles2024,
  title        = {{Considerations for a Post-Pandemic Monetary Policy Framework}},
  author       = {Charles L. Evans},
  journal      = {Brookings Papers on Economic Activity},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2024.a965431},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Considerations for a Post-Pandemic Monetary Policy Framework

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.55

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.59 × 0.4 = 0.24
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.