Free and equal? The realities of lived experiences of food aid in the UK

Maddy Sarah Power & Madeleine Baxter

Journal of Social Policy2026https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279425101256article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Drawing upon a large longitudinal qualitative study on lived experiences of food aid in England, we question contemporary academic and policy categorisations and portrayals of food aid. Contrary to ideas of a diverse food aid sector offering choice and dignity, we identify clear uniformity in the language participants use to describe different forms of food charity; any organisation which offers food for free or at very low cost to take away is predominantly described as a ‘food bank’. Simultaneously, however, we find marked inequalities in lived experiences of food charity by gender, age and race and ethnicity, and clear indications that demographically oriented exclusion is ever-present in food aid. We argue that the key fault line shaping lived experiences of the UK community food sector is not the ‘type’ of provision but demography (age, gender and parenthood, race and ethnicity) and yet inequalities remain broadly ignored in discussions of UK food aid. In doing so, we provide a critical contribution to scholarship on the changing nature of welfare pluralism and the lived experience of poverty today.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279425101256

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{maddy2026,
  title        = {{Free and equal? The realities of lived experiences of food aid in the UK}},
  author       = {Maddy Sarah Power & Madeleine Baxter},
  journal      = {Journal of Social Policy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279425101256},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Free and equal? The realities of lived experiences of food aid in the UK

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.