arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Integrity risk and financial reporting: who pays for voting?

George Littlejohn

Journal of Risk Finance2004https://doi.org/10.1108/09657960410514652article
AJG 1
Weight
0.42

What the paper says

There have been many efforts at improving corporate governance in the last few years following the spate of American corporate scandals. The reforms have resulted in the focus now moving to one of the most glaring anomalies in the link of safeguards against the risk of the integrity of financial reporting being damaged. The author looks at the whole difficult, tangled and sometime opaque system of shareholder voting and assesses whether proposed reforms to the system will work.

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09657960410514652

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{george2004,
  title        = {{Integrity risk and financial reporting: who pays for voting?}},
  author       = {George Littlejohn},
  journal      = {Journal of Risk Finance},
  year         = {2004},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09657960410514652},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Integrity risk and financial reporting: who pays for voting?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.42

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.41 × 0.4 = 0.16
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.