Sonographer upper extremity posture and arm strength demands: a simulation study exploring scan location and patient size

Cameron J. Lang et al.

International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics2026https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2026.2619317article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Work-related musculoskeletal disorder (WMSD) rates are increasing among sonographers, with high worker populations reporting pain and discomfort. Upper extremity physical demands and exposures in this cohort are largely unknown, requiring attention to enact changes that mitigate future injury risk. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effects of patient size and scan location on upper extremity postures and joint moment capability of sonographers. An a priori survey was completed by local sonographer staff. Digital human modeling (DHM) of 18 patient avatars and eight scan locations produced 144 scan scenarios. Sonographer exposure assessments were completed using rapid upper limb assessment (RULA) and the arm force field (AFF). The AFF demonstrated that a large subset of scenarios exceeded strength capabilities for 99% of the population. RULA scores of 3 or greater were present across all scans, indicating need for further investigation regardless of patient size and scan location.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2026.2619317

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{cameron2026,
  title        = {{Sonographer upper extremity posture and arm strength demands: a simulation study exploring scan location and patient size}},
  author       = {Cameron J. Lang et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2026.2619317},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Sonographer upper extremity posture and arm strength demands: a simulation study exploring scan location and patient size

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.