Refining genetic discoveries of group knockoffs via a feature-level filter

Jiaqi Gu et al.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C: Applied Statistics2026https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssc/qlag006article
AJG 3
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Identifying variants that carry substantial information on the trait of interest remains a core topic in genetic studies. In analysing the EADB-UKBB dataset to identify genetic variants associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), however, we recognize that both existing marginal association tests and conditional independence tests using existing knockoff filters suffer either power loss or lack of informativeness, especially when strong correlations exist among variants. To address these limitations, we propose a new feature-versus-group (FVG) filter that seeks balance between the power and precision in identifying important features from a set of strongly correlated features using group knockoffs. In extensive simulation studies, the FVG filter controls the expected proportion of false discoveries and identifies important features in smaller catching sets without large power loss. Applying the proposed method to the EADB-UKBB dataset, we discover important variants from 89 loci (similar to the most powerful group knockoff filter) with catching sets of substantially smaller size and higher purity and verify the biological informativeness of our discoveries.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssc/qlag006

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jiaqi2026,
  title        = {{Refining genetic discoveries of group knockoffs via a feature-level filter}},
  author       = {Jiaqi Gu et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C: Applied Statistics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssc/qlag006},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Refining genetic discoveries of group knockoffs via a feature-level filter

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.